Ireland says “no” to changing the definition of family

Amdework Ferhiwot

Irish voters’ recent rejection of proposed constitutional amendments has sent shockwaves through a part of the political establishment of the nation. Prime Minister Leo Varadkar has conceded defeat in a double referendum that aimed to redefine family roles and clarify women’s duties in the constitution. The votes, held on International Women’s Day, resulted in a significant rejection of proposed amendments.

The first referendum sought the proposed change meant to different definition of family, beyond marriage. Voters were asked to remove the reference to marriage as the basis on which the family is founded. However, the majority of voters 67.7% rejected this amendment. Their decision reflects a commitment to preserving the traditional understanding of family rooted in marriage. The rejection of this amendment brings into line with the belief that marriage holds a unique and foundational role in family life.

The advocates of the other referendum -about the role of women in the home- sought a change to modernize the Constitution by eliminating what they considered very old-fashioned language. It is intended to address outdated terminology and promote equality. Despite these intentions, 73.9% of voters opposed the change.

This resounding rejection underscores the significance of the contributions of women in the home as something essential. The voters expressed their commitment to preserving the unique and irreplaceable role of women within the family.

Prime Minister Leo Varadkar accepted the results, acknowledging that the government had failed to convince the majority to vote “yes” on both amendments. It’s evident that these referendums, despite their apparent intentions, touched upon deeply held convictions and values within the Irish society.

Photo: https://www.voanews.com/a/why-did-ireland-s-referendums-on-family-women-fail-/7521783.html